Hem>AI
Press Release
Press release:
USA:
Three years on, family visits still denied to two of the "Miami
Five"
7th
of June, 2004
Three
years ago, five Cuban men were convicted in Miami on charges
of spying on behalf of Cuba. Amnesty International has written
to the US authorities on several occasions to express concern
at the treatment received by the men and the difficulties
faced by their families in gaining access to them.
The
so-called "Miami Five" were convicted in June 2001
in Miami, following a seven-month federal espionage trial,
on charges relating to conspiracy to commit offences against
the USA, and in the case of one, conspiracy to commit murder.
Cuban nationals Gerardo Hernández Nordelo, Ramón
Labañino, Antonio Guerrero, Fernando González
and René González are serving terms from 15
years to life imprisonment in maximum-security federal prisons
across the country.
On
March 10, 2004, the appeals attorneys for the case presented
their arguments to the three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit
in Miami. One of the central issues raised by the lawyers
was the failure of the district court to change the venue
of the trial from Miami, despite repeated requests by the
defence at the time.
The
attorneys argued that the pervasive hostility within Miami
towards the Cuban government and those associated with it,
combined with the extensive media coverage generated by the
case, was inimical to ensuring a fair trial for the men. The
decision of the court is still pending.
Amnesty
International has raised concerns with the US Government about
the conditions in which the five men have been held. In March
2003, the organisation wrote to the government to express
concern that the five had been placed in solitary confinement
in their respective prisons, reportedly on a directive from
the Bureau of Prisons.
The
organization was alarmed that these Special Administrative
Measures (SAMs) imposed on the men restricted telephone calls
and visits, including attorney visits, despite the fact that
appeal proceedings were pending in their criminal case.
In
response to AI's concerns, Director Lewis, US Department of
Justice, informed the organisation that the SAMs had been
lifted and that the men had been returned to general population.
Furthermore, Director Lewis stated that "concerns with
regard to attorney-client communication led the US... to issue
a temporary modification of the SAM to restore the flow of
attorney-client legal communication, and of legal mail."
In
December 2002, AI raised concern with the Attorney General
that the five prisoners had reportedly been denied visits
from their families in Cuba. After a wait of almost six-months,
visas were granted to three of the wives, however, for the
remaining two, access to their husbands is still being denied.
René
Gonzalez's wife, Olga Salanueva, applied for and was granted
a visa to visit in March 2002 with their four-year-old daughter,
but this was later revoked. The last time she saw her husband
was on the eve of his trial in November 2000.
Gerardo
Hernández Nordelo's wife, Adriana Perez, had obtained
a visa, but was detained and interrogated by the FBI upon
arrival in the US before being expelled from the country.
Citing security concerns, the US government continues to refuse
to reissue these visas.
AI
has urged that these restrictions be urgently reviewed, drawing
the government's attention to international standards that
stress the importance of the family and the right of all prisoners
to maintain contact with their families and to receive visits.
In the case of prisoners whose families reside outside of
the US, indefinite or even permanent denial of visits from
the prisoner's immediate family is perceived as a severe deprivation
to the individual.
Amnesty
International has urged the government to consider granting
temporary visas to the two women for visitation purposes,
without prejudice to appropriate security measures, if there
is no reasonable and conclusive evidence for continuing to
withhold them.
Amnesty
International continues to review the case in consideration
of the fairness of the criminal proceedings leading to the
convictions of the five men.
http://news.amnesty.org/mav/index/ENGAMR516072004
|